Entries Tagged as ''

What’s different about health care?

The overwhelming majority of Americans are not Communists. In general, we believe that a free-ish market is a better way to organize the production and distribution of goods and services than government departments. But an awful lot of Americans seem to want government-run health care. Why? What makes health care so different from the rest of the economy that many of us want to turn it over to the people who brought us the Postal Service and the Department of Motor Vehicles?

Is it because health care is a necessity? Food is a necessity, but no mainstream politicians are pushing plans for tax-funded universal distribution of cheezburgers.

Is it because health care is expensive? Housing is expensive, and it’s a necessity, so why is nobody promising me socialized apartments?

Is it because we’re not happy with the health care the market is providing us with? I doubt that, too. I work for Microsoft, and everybody’s got tons of complaints about our products, but nobody wants to replace us with Federal Windows and Federal Internet Explorer.

Is it because other first-world countries have socialized medicine? If Canada jumped off a bridge, would you jump off, too? Besides which, other first-world countries really don’t have socialized medicine. Britain and Canada may have true socialized medicine, but Switzerland and the Netherlands only have mandatory private insurance programs, and France and Germany have health care systems which are more market-oriented than America’s current health care system (which includes Medicare, Medicaid, and a tax system which heavily subsidizes full-service employer-provided health insurance).

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

So today, I am standing with Senator Obama to say: Yes we can.

She had a tough job with this speech. On the one wrist, she had to acknowledge that her supporters had done a magnificent job. Then she had to explain why Obama will make a fantastic president.

“The way to continue our fight now – to accomplish the goals for which we stand – is to take our energy, our passion, our strength and do all we can to help elect Barack Obama the next President of the United States. ”

The way she said it, with such obvious passion and sincerity in her voice, she means it.

“I understand that we all know this has been a tough fight. The Democratic Party is a family, and it’s now time to restore the ties that bind us together and to come together around the ideals we share, the values we cherish, and the country we love. ”
Absolutely, 100% the right thing to say. The Party isn’t the “Hillary Clinton Show”, it is about a certain set of ideals– ideals which both Hillary and Barack share. Obama has the standard, let’s line up behind his charge.

And, as a final swing, she reminds all voters how good they had it when we last had a Democratic president:

“We made tremendous progress during the 90s under a Democratic President, with a flourishing economy, and our leadership for peace and security respected around the world. Just think how much more progress we could have made over the past 40 years if we had a Democratic president. Think about the lost opportunities of these past seven years – on the environment and the economy, on health care and civil rights, on education, foreign policy and the Supreme Court. Imagine how far we could’ve come, how much we could’ve achieved if we had just had a Democrat in the White House.”

I’ll leave it off there. Hillary: you did good. And if– gods forbid!– things don’t work out for Barack, I’ll gleefully pull the lever for you in 2012…

Transcript

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare