<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Non-Socialized Universal Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2008/06/20/non-socialized-universal-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2008/06/20/non-socialized-universal-healthcare/</link>
	<description>Peaking under the Veil of Ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 17:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Healthcare &#187; Healthcare technologies - Radiology Societies Pen Joint Letter to CMS</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2008/06/20/non-socialized-universal-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare &#187; Healthcare technologies - Radiology Societies Pen Joint Letter to CMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/?p=50#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] Non-Socialized Universal HealthcareThe thing about healthcare is that there are many, many ways of doing it. Ours is about the worst. I mean, maybe not the worst possible, but certainly the worst we’re likely to see and still have a whole ton of very competent doctors. &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Non-Socialized Universal HealthcareThe thing about healthcare is that there are many, many ways of doing it. Ours is about the worst. I mean, maybe not the worst possible, but certainly the worst we’re likely to see and still have a whole ton of very competent doctors. &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maniakes</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2008/06/20/non-socialized-universal-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Maniakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/?p=50#comment-74</guid>
		<description>My first reaction to Klein&#039;s proposal is that the 10% VAT is a dealbreaker to me, but I could get behind a toned-down version of it where the voucher is means-tested to constrain costs to the point where the program could be funded by the Medi* phase-out and the elimination of the tax break for employer-provided health care. I haven&#039;t run the numbers, but I suspect the means-testing would not scale down the program much at all once we&#039;re 10 years or so into the program.

I&#039;d also like the voucher to be refundable, so that if I&#039;d prefer a health care plan that costs less than the voucher I qualify for, I can keep the savings.

The minimum coverage level is another potential sticking point. My finances are not so tight that a doctor&#039;s visit here or there paid out-of-pocket will hurt me particularly badly, so I&#039;d prefer not to &quot;insure&quot; routine expenses. And even unexpected events of moderate expense, I generally prefer to self-insure (I have $1000+ deducatables on my renter&#039;s insurance and my auto insurance). WIll the &quot;minimum coverage level&quot; permit me my current health plan which has a $1200 annual deducatable?

Heck, if I don&#039;t want health care at all for some reason (suppose I&#039;m a Christian Scientist and I believe that if I get sick and die, that&#039;s God&#039;s will and I shouldn&#039;t fight it), can I opt out of the system entirely and keep the cash instead of the voucher? I&#039;m inclined to think that I should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction to Klein&#8217;s proposal is that the 10% VAT is a dealbreaker to me, but I could get behind a toned-down version of it where the voucher is means-tested to constrain costs to the point where the program could be funded by the Medi* phase-out and the elimination of the tax break for employer-provided health care. I haven&#8217;t run the numbers, but I suspect the means-testing would not scale down the program much at all once we&#8217;re 10 years or so into the program.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like the voucher to be refundable, so that if I&#8217;d prefer a health care plan that costs less than the voucher I qualify for, I can keep the savings.</p>
<p>The minimum coverage level is another potential sticking point. My finances are not so tight that a doctor&#8217;s visit here or there paid out-of-pocket will hurt me particularly badly, so I&#8217;d prefer not to &#8220;insure&#8221; routine expenses. And even unexpected events of moderate expense, I generally prefer to self-insure (I have $1000+ deducatables on my renter&#8217;s insurance and my auto insurance). WIll the &#8220;minimum coverage level&#8221; permit me my current health plan which has a $1200 annual deducatable?</p>
<p>Heck, if I don&#8217;t want health care at all for some reason (suppose I&#8217;m a Christian Scientist and I believe that if I get sick and die, that&#8217;s God&#8217;s will and I shouldn&#8217;t fight it), can I opt out of the system entirely and keep the cash instead of the voucher? I&#8217;m inclined to think that I should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
