Entries Tagged as ''

Planning stages

When the economy gets bad, low-cost health care providers start seeing more patients. It seems natural that people still want to prevent cancer, pregnancy, or STDs, but perhaps can’t afford regular doctor visits. Planned Parenthood is under constant attack for it’s efforts at providing women with high-quality/low cost health care, and this year is seeing its contributions from state budget endangered. So, they’re selling gift certficates. because nothing says “I love you” like a free pap smear.

When access to contraception declines abortion rates go up, and decreased ability to test for and treat STDs will certainly cause untold human misery. Naturally, the groups most outraged at the continued existence of an organization which helps people take care of themselves are called “pro life”…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

If reading is too hard for you…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Legal. Personal. Political.

Poor IL Governor Rod Blagojevich. His money situation is so dire he’s trying to sell President-Elect Obama’s Senate seat. He’ll take a bit of everything – from a corporate board membership for his wife, to $500,000. Whatever spare change you have lying around.

I’m curious to how much this will effect Obama, and how much Obama knew about it. There are definitely references to the President-Elect, but does that mean that he was in communication with Blagojevich? They talk about White House influence more than once, but often in terms of sending indirect signals that don’t lead back to Blagojevich.

Below are some of the transcripts from the Affidavit. Tons of fun reading. Warning: explicit language below.

[The Illinois Governor has sole discretion in appointing someone to the Senate seat.]

“I’ve got this thing and it’s fucking golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for fuckin’ nothing. I’m not gonna do it. And, and I can always use it. I can parachute me there.” [referring to the open Senate seat]

ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that his decision about the open Senate seat will be based on three criteria in the following order of importance: “our legal situation, our personal situation, my political situation.

In particular, ROD BLAGOJEVICH has been intercepted conspiring to trade the senate seat for particular positions that the President-elect has the power to appoint (e.g. the Secretary of Health and Human Services). ROD BLAGOJEVICH has also been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for his wife’s placement on paid corporate boards or ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s placement at a private foundation in a significant position with a substantial salary. ROD BLAGOJEVICH has also
been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for millions of dollars in funding for a non-profit organization that he would start and that would employ him at a substantial salary after he left the governorship.

ROD BLAGOJEVICH told Deputy Governor A that if he is not going to get anything of value for the open Senate seat, then ROD BLAGOJEVICH will take the Senate seat himself: “if . . . they’re not going to offer anything of any value, then I might just take it.”

[Senate Candidate 1 is an adviser to President-Elect] During the call, ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated, “unless I get something real good for [Senate Candidate 1], shit, I’ll just send myself, you know what I’m saying.”
[Later he says] “I’m going to keep this Senate option for me a real possibility, you know, and therefore I can drive a hard bargain.” Later, ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that the Senate seat “is a fucking valuable thing, you just don’t give it away for nothing.”

On November 5, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH spoke with Deputy Governor A regarding positions that ROD BLAGOJEVICH might be able to obtain in exchange for the soon-to-be vacated Senate seat. Among the potential positions discussed were Secretary of Health and Human Services and various ambassadorships. Deputy Governor A noted that the cabinet position of Secretary of the Energy is “the one that makes the most money.” Deputy Governor A stated that it is hard not to give the Secretary of Energy position to a Texan, but with ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s coal background it might be a possibility.

On November 4, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH spoke with JOHN HARRIS regarding the potential vacant Senate seat. ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that the “trick . . . is how do you conduct indirectly . . . a negotiation” for the Senate seat. Thereafter, ROD BLAGOJEVICH analogized his situation to that of a sports agent shopping a potential free agent to various teams, stating “how much are you offering, [President-elect]? What are you offering, [Senate Candidate 2]? . . . Can always go to. . . [Senate Candidate 3].” Later ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he will make a decision on the Senate seat “in good faith . . . but it is not coming for free. . . .It’s got to be good stuff for the people of Illinois and good for me.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH states “[President-elect], you want it? Fine. But, its got to be
good or I could always take [the Senate seat].”

On November 5, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH spoke with JOHN HARRIS regarding what ROD BLAGOJEVICH could obtain for the Senate seat. After discussing various federal governmental positions that ROD BLAGOJEVICH would trade the Senate seat for, ROD BLAGOJEVICH asked about “the private sector” and whether the Presidentelect could “put something together there. . . .Something big.” Thereafter, HARRIS suggested that the President-elect could make ROD BLAGOJEVICH the head of a private
foundation. ROD BLAGOJEVICH told HARRIS that he should do “homework” on private foundations “right away.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH asked whether he could get a high-ranking position at the Red Cross. HARRIS stated that “it’s got to be a group that is dependent on [the President-elect],” and that a President probably could not influence the Red Cross. ROD BLAGOJEVICH told HARRIS to “look into all of those.”

On November 5, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH talked with JOHN HARRIS and Deputy Governor A. They discussed potential private foundations with which ROD BLAGOJEVICH might be able to get a position in exchange for filling the Senate seat and, in particular, those foundations that are “heavily dependent on federal aid” and which, therefore, the White House would have the most “influence” on. ROD BLAGOJEVICH wanted to know how much the positions being discussed pay.

On November 6, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH talked with Spokesman. ROD BLAGOJEVICH told Spokesman to leak to a particular columnist for the Chicago Sun-Times, that Senate Candidate 2 is in the running for the vacant Senate seat. According to ROD BLAGOJEVICH, by doing this, he wanted “to send a message to the [President-elect’s] people,” but did not want it known that the message was from ROD BLAGOJEVICH.

On November 7, 2008, ROD BLAGOJEVICH talked with Advisor A about the Senate seat. ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he is willing to “trade” the Senate seat to Open source information indicates that 22 Change to Win is an organization affiliated with seven unions, including SEIU, and appears to be focused on having the affiliated unions work together on matters of common interest. SEIU Official is affiliated with SEIU. Senate Candidate 1 in exchange for the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services in the President-elect’s cabinet.

ROD BLAGOJEVICH indicated in the call that if he was appointed as Secretary of Health and Human Services by the President-elect, then ROD BLAGOJEVICH would appoint Senate Candidate 1 to the open Senate seat. HARRIS stated “we wanted our ask to be reasonable and rather than. . .make it look like some sort of selfish grab for a quid pro quo.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he needs to consider his family and that he is “financially” hurting. HARRIS said that they are considering what will help the “financial security” of the Blagojevich family and what will keep ROD BLAGOJEVICH “politically
viable.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated, “I want to make money.” During the call, ROD BLAGOJEVICH, HARRIS, and Advisor B discussed the prospect of working a three-way deal for the open Senate seat. HARRIS noted that ROD BLAGOJEVICH is interested in taking a high-paying position with an organization called “Change to Win,” which is connected to Service Employees International Union (“SEIU”).22 HARRIS suggested that SEIU Official make ROD BLAGOJEVICH the head of Change to Win and, in exchange, the President-elect could help Change to Win with its legislative agenda on a national level. [this is a fascinating conversation that you can read more of on page 61 of the affidavit]

ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that Governor General Counsel believes the President-elect can get ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the President-elect’s pick to the Senate.

ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he is “struggling” financially and does “not want to be Governor for the next two years.”

ROD BLAGOJEVICH said that the consultants (Advisor B and another consultant are believed to be on the call at that time) are telling him that he has to “suck it up” for two years and do nothing and give this “motherfucker [the President-elect] his senator. Fuck him. For nothing? Fuck him.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH states that he will put “[Senate Candidate 4]” in the Senate “before I just give fucking [Senate Candidate 1] a fucking Senate seat and I don’t get anything.” (Senate Candidate 4 is a Deputy Governor of the State of Illinois). ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he needs to find a way to take the “financial stress” off of his family and that his wife is as qualified or more qualified than
another specifically named individual to sit on corporate boards.

Among other things, ROD BLAGOJEVICH raised the issue of whether the President-elect could help get ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s wife on “paid corporate boards right now.” Advisor A responded that he “think[s] they could” and that a “Presidentelect . . . can do almost anything he sets his mind to.” ROD BLAGOJEVICH states that he will appoint “[Senate Candidate 1] . . . but if they feel like they can do this and not fucking give me anything . . . then I’ll fucking go [Senate Candidate 5]. ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that if his wife could get on some corporate boards and “picks up another 150 grand a year or whatever” it would help ROD BLAGOJEVICH get through the next several years as
Governor.

Later in the conversation, ROD BLAGOJEVICH said he knows that the President-elect wants Senate Candidate 1 for the Senate seat but “they’re not willing to give me anything except appreciation. Fuck them.”

[conversations about Warren Buffet beginning a non-profit organization - $10 to $20 million - for Blagojevich to run, or] ROD BLAGOJEVICH said that “[Senate Candidate 6]” (Senate Candidate 6, based on other intercepted conversations, is believed to be a wealthy person from Illinois) “could raise me money like that for a Senate seat.”

Also on December 5, 2008, after publication of the Tribune article described above, ROD BLAGOJEVICH and three others discussed whether to move money out of the Friends of Blagojevich campaign fund to avoid having the money frozen and also considered the possibility of prepaying the money to ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s criminal defense attorney with an understanding that the attorney would donate the money back at a later time if it was not needed.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

An open letter to Ron Coleman

Ron,

Currently Opposite-sexed couples may apply for– and be granted by the state– a bundle of legal rights. These rights include inheritance and hospital visitation to name just two of the more than 1000.

Do you believe that same-sex couples should be denied the ability to apply for those rights? Do you believe that finding someone’s love “viscerally offensive” should be grounds to deny them rights you enjoy?

I really do think you’re a nice guy, Ron.

Yet you’re turning the basic ability of an entire group of people to be with the ones they love into a “political question”. It is nice of you to grant gays the right to be “[left]alone regarding [their] private lives. Just show up for work like the rest of us, dress as flamboyantly as you like or as straight as you like, and really, we won’t think you’re “bad” or anything.”

Of course, the alternative to being “left alone” doesn’t bear thinking on. But here’s the thing: grant gays full rights without distinction as to sexual orientation, and I guarantee their political agenda will disappear.

Its’ a lot simpler than you think.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Prop 8 – The Musical

Performed at my alma mater, Sacramento City College

See more Jack Black videos at Funny or Die
Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Emoticons, legally speaking

:*     :D     :(      :*

As a grammar snob, I believe punctuation is a very vital part of writing.  And while I recognize that many internet users have a hard time finding the shift button to capitalize (but oddly enough, not the caps lock button), and don’t even know what a comma is, punctuation is an imperative part of any decent internet experience.  Unless you’re on I Can Has Cheezburger.  Then it is excused.  Otherwise, I believe punctuation adds nuance and meaning to writing.

Famous and over-used example:
The panda eats shoots and leaves.
The panda eats, shoots, and leaves.  (Oh!  The blood and carnage!)

The Nebraska Supreme Court is currently hearing oral arguments on a case involving the the enticement of a “15-year-old girl”, who was actually a police investigator.  When he attempted to break it off in the two months before he met her, she responded with emoticons of angry faces and kissing.  The reason the Nebraska Supreme Court is hearing the case is because the jury was not instructed that they could find him not guilty if they believed the police investigator actually entraped James Pischel (the man who went to prison).

George Love, with Nebraska’s Attorney General’s Office, said the jury did not need instructions on entrapment because the emoticon is only a form of punctuation.  If we consider it to be part of government inducement, then an exclamation point must be part of entrapment too, Love said.

With my above example, punctuation matters.  A lot.  Because writing can often be vague, punctuation – and emoticons – really help clarify the meaning.  I know I’ve gotten more than a few text messages where a wink would have clarified the situation immensely.  Describing an emoticon as a punctuation should not diminish it’s impact, but strengthen it.  Also, in due respect to all of my English teachers, grammar and punctuation are really, really important.  Or maybe pandas are just really violent.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Coalition for Change: The Real Team of Rivals?

(Hi everyone, I’m the new guy, Pink Polo. The Pundit should adding my bio shortly. Below is my first post here at IDB, which is also crossposted on my blog, Theory in Practice. To get a sense of what you can expect from me, check that out – or my travelogue from 2006, the Pink Polo Goes to Africa. Anyway, here beginneth my first post. Hope you like it! – The Polo)

Amidst the media-driven furore surrounding the rollout of Pres.-Elect Obama’s cabinet, and the “One President at a Time” message that has become a press meme over the last weeks of economic consternation in this country, there is a real, no-foolin’, honest-to-goodness street fight for the governmental leadership of a major Western power: Canada.

Yup, America’s Hat decided that what’s good for those of us below the 49th Parallel might make sense for them too.

You might remember (though no one would blame you if you didn’t) that Canada held a federal election less than 45 days ago. That election, despite some close polling just days before the election spurred on by the horrendous economic news that hit in October, was won handily by the Conservative Party, and the incumbent Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. There has been, however, no honeymoon period for the new government. As you’ve no doubt seen from the news in this country, the economic news has gone from “Holy Crap” to “Stockbroker Suicide Watch” to its current state, “China’s Redheaded Stepchild” in a matter of what seemed like hours. Leading the charge to ignominy has been the automotive industry, especially General Motors, which has very quietly become one of the most unfathomably awfully run companies in the history of modern economics. Adam Smith himself, were he to come back from the dead, would take a look at GM’s books and “future plans” and quietly cry himself to sleep reading a copy of The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

Would care to hazard a guess as to what one of Canada’s largest employers is?

Anyone?

Yup. General Motors. Ford too, for that matter. Windsor, Ontario – just a Sarah Palin glance away from the rusting former automotive capital of Detroit – became a hub for car production over the last few decades thanks to Canada’s national health care scheme, which helped (wait for it…wait for it) shave overhead costs while getting essentially the same quality of work.

Now, back to today’s issues for our neighbours to the, uh, Nourth. As Pres.-Elect Obama has already begun tackling the severe economic crisis that he will face as President beginning the 20th of next January by touting his new team of advisers, promoting economic stimulus and infrastructural redevelopment across sectors, so too has Mr. Harper, the Canadian Premier set to work on a new budget that will drastically and directly affect the lives of ordinary Canadians who seek assurances that their government, as ever a world leader in the welfare of its citizens, will once again provide the safety net they need to survive this deep, globally interconnected recession.

So, as Mr. Harper presented his budget to the Parliament last week, what schemes might his Conservative government concoct to see Canada through rough seas? Increased unemployment benefits? Job retraining programs to keep workers at pace with global trends? An Obamaesque commitment to reinvestment in infrastructure?

The answer they got was very simple. Nothing.

The Harper government provided no economic stimulus in the new budget, not even one of his good buddy George W. Bush’s ridiculous tax rebate debacles.

And that brings us to the extraordinary situation we see unfolding right above us as we speak. Almost immediately, the opposition parties saw their moment, and thus was born one of the oddest political marriages in Western political history. The three major players in this new arrangement – Canada has never had a formal coalition government since the end of the Dominion – come from very distinct political paths. First, the leader of the opposition, Stephane Dion, leader of the Liberal Party. Quebecois, and with a political mindset forged from the rule of his predecessor, Jean Chretien, Dion led his Liberal Party since defeat in the 2006 election, after the disgraced Paul Martin was forced out by a Conservative non-confidence vote, through this latest round of voting, which saw the worst Liberal defeats in the history of the Party. He was so reviled within his own party that he began the leadership fight to succeed him even before ballots were cast. At this moment, three men are lined up behind him, fighting it out for the position of Liberal leader from May 2009. His political obituary was written, in stone, over the last month, as he seemed bound and determined to leave his party in disarray.

And now, Stephane Dion is the clubhouse leader for Prime Minister in a new government that could be formed within days. Talk about zero to hero…

Also in the mix is the man who has very quietly risen to prominence as one of the most Progressive political leaders in the Western world, Jack Layton. Layton, an Ontarioan and leader of the New Democratic Party has very quickly made himself into a kingmaker of sorts in federal politics. By providing the roadmap back to governance for the Liberal Party, Layton was able to secure six cabinet positions in the proposed new government, as well as a number of lower-level bureaucratic positions of importance for his party. Layton, and the NDP’s, influence will thus have much more of a broad impact under this arrangement, particularly given the leadership struggle in what would be the ruling party. Thus, while Layton’s gamble does not necessarily cement the NDP as a force to be reckoned with on the federal stage, it does better serve his constituency than Ed Broadbent’s fool’s errand during the Trudeau period in the 1970s. This, then, is truly the exciting part of the story for progressives on both sides of the border, as Canada looks towards a more progressive stance as America’s staunchest ally. Now, that’s change you can believe in!

But here’s where the story gets really, really (are you even still reading), and I mean, really interesting. Given the disastrous results for the Liberals in the October poll, the combined NDP/Liberal Alliance would represent only 44% of Canadian support and only 114 seats in the Parliament, as opposed to the Conservatives 37% and 143 seats, respectively. So, how do we get this idea off the ground? Mais oui! Le Bloc!

The Bloc Quebecois’ 50 seats, and 10% of federal support would push the coalition government to a majority government, of sorts. So, done deal, right? Well…geh…okay, does anyone know the Bloc’s single, solitary issue?

Health care? No. The economy? No.

Reinstituting the Quebec Nordiques’ hockey franchise? No…well, okay, maybe that too?

Yeah, Le Bloc is the separatist party of Quebec. So now, this coalition Canadian government will be held up by a party whose sole purpose is to work for the “rightful” independence of one of its provinces. However, of all three men who entered into this compact in Ottawa this morning, Gilles Duceppe may be the one who made the critical misstep. First of all, he is now going to have problems at home with the hardcore separatists who will only see him ganging up with a Federalist Quebecois and the Anti-Conservative (BQ voters tend to be issue matched with the Conservative Party) Layton. And second, perhaps more critically, Duceppe has promised to not push a non-confidence motion of his own for eighteen months, effectively declawing Duceppe to hold his former rivals to the fire on issues of import to Quebecois voters. At the first sign of trouble, he should expect a leadership fight bubbling up from the PQ (the provincial wing of the party), especially given Duceppe’s own inability to secure more seats in the Federal Parliament or push a referendum on independence in his nearly ten years as party leader.

Now, these three men sit at the same table, a partnership forged from practicality, not politics, putting country before party. This team of rivals can look forward only to uncharted waters and stormy seas, but, if they can make this almost farcical arrangement work, it may cement prosperity for Canadians for decades to come. And, hey, it’s fun to watch for us Americans. (Okay, maybe just us political geeks…)

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Glory is Ben

It’s summer of 1991. The Berlin Wall has been down for a year and a half. The Soviet Union is a few short months from officially dissolving. The Cold war is over. Terminator 2 takes the box office in a walk– it’s message that “there’s no fate but what you make” signals that even the apocalyptic destruction of the human species can be avoided.

Flash forward a decade. A mere 18 months after the World Trade Center came down, we have a 3rd Terminator installment. Despite the best efforts of the protagonists, the robots let loose nuclear war. Message: Armageddon will happen, like it or not. A few days earlier had seen the release of the excellent Zombie flick 28 Days Later.

In between these movies had come a slew of Vampire shows, films and books. Notably, of course, Buffy the Vampire Slayer. This poorly thought out article seems to think that the difference between Zombies and Vampires is a simple Red/Blue phenomenon. It’s a bit deeper than that…

As demonstrated by the picture heading this article, monsters are scary because they replace us at the head of the food chain. Sentient Killer Robots (SKRs), Zombies, Vampires, Werewolves, etc; all scare us because they remind us that we are bestial and our place on top of the animal kingdom is precarious. Different kinds of monsters scare us in different ways, dependent on the way in which they kill us.

Certain monsters prey on us (Vampires, Werewolves), some seek to replace us (Sentient Killer Robots, Zombies). These are, of course, very broad categories, and each type of monster is unique in what it would do. SKRs would replace us wholly, creating an entire new society on top the bones of humanity. Zombies, on the other severed hand, are more akin to a virus. They would wipe us off the face of the Earth and then either die themselves or continue a mindless existence. Either way, they represent a negation of humanity.

This is almost the opposite of Vampires. Vampires represent an excess of humanity. Lust unquenchable. Hunger that cannot be contained or controlled, but only temporarily sated by the ingestion of blood… the essence of humanity.

Thus it is no accident that Vampires and sex are inextricably linked. We see Vampires crop up when society is sexually repressed, times of social conservatism when talking about such subjects is taboo. Or, for teenaged girls, when sex is always taboo.

Zombies are the end of the world. Full stop. When society feels that it has come to an existential crisis– such as points of the Cold War or the post 9/11 mindspace– here comes the Zombie hoard. Our only hope is that the SKRs will slay them all before turning on us.

We have noticed of late a tampering down of Zombie movies and end-of-the-world literature. This would seem to indicate that America is getting past her fear that at any moment she might be destroyed. This would be why the Republican party has suffered devastating losses in the last pair of elections. Hope, it seems, turns the country Blue. And also fends off the zombie hoards….

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare