<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Extra Calorie meal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2010/01/05/extra-calorie-meal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2010/01/05/extra-calorie-meal/</link>
	<description>Peaking under the Veil of Ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kara</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2010/01/05/extra-calorie-meal/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/?p=257#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I always find it interesting when there&#039;s a word whose original meaning is one that few people think about anymore. Anytime someone mentions &#039;diet&#039;, we instantly think that they are trying to lose weight. The two concepts are indelibly linked in our minds.

And yet the original meaning of the word, is simply &#039;habitual nourishment&#039;. Using it to refer to a temporary alteration of our eating habits in order to lose weight is what we&#039;ve morphed into.

Back on topic.... I definitely agree that the way foods are priced these days it&#039;s easier to get a lot of calories than it is to get a healthy meal. 

In fact, if you go to the local grocery store and start comparing... anything that claims to be &#039;healthy&#039; or &#039;organic&#039;, etc.. always has a higher price tag than similar products.

What always annoys me the most about this, is that if you really compare the nutrition values on the products... a lot of times they&#039;re not really much healthier for you than the cheaper and non &#039;health-labeled&#039; products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always find it interesting when there&#8217;s a word whose original meaning is one that few people think about anymore. Anytime someone mentions &#8216;diet&#8217;, we instantly think that they are trying to lose weight. The two concepts are indelibly linked in our minds.</p>
<p>And yet the original meaning of the word, is simply &#8216;habitual nourishment&#8217;. Using it to refer to a temporary alteration of our eating habits in order to lose weight is what we&#8217;ve morphed into.</p>
<p>Back on topic&#8230;. I definitely agree that the way foods are priced these days it&#8217;s easier to get a lot of calories than it is to get a healthy meal. </p>
<p>In fact, if you go to the local grocery store and start comparing&#8230; anything that claims to be &#8216;healthy&#8217; or &#8216;organic&#8217;, etc.. always has a higher price tag than similar products.</p>
<p>What always annoys me the most about this, is that if you really compare the nutrition values on the products&#8230; a lot of times they&#8217;re not really much healthier for you than the cheaper and non &#8216;health-labeled&#8217; products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rall</title>
		<link>http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/2010/01/05/extra-calorie-meal/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indignantdesertbirds.com/?p=257#comment-559</guid>
		<description>If I were looking for a high caloric intake on very little money, I&#039;d make rice and beans my primary staple. Buying one-pound bags of each at the grocery, I can get about 3000 calories for $2.50. It&#039;d run me about twice that at a convenience store if I somehow had not access to a grocery. Conversely, if I have access to Costco, Smart &amp; Final, or somewhere else I can buy 50# bags, I can get it much cheaper. But even at convenience store prices, it&#039;s quite a bit cheaper per calorie than McDonald&#039;s. Healthier, too.

And if I wanted a low-calorie meal at McDonald&#039;s, I&#039;d just buy a hamburger (250 calories) and skip the high-calorie, high-markup fried potatoes and fizzy sugar water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were looking for a high caloric intake on very little money, I&#8217;d make rice and beans my primary staple. Buying one-pound bags of each at the grocery, I can get about 3000 calories for $2.50. It&#8217;d run me about twice that at a convenience store if I somehow had not access to a grocery. Conversely, if I have access to Costco, Smart &amp; Final, or somewhere else I can buy 50# bags, I can get it much cheaper. But even at convenience store prices, it&#8217;s quite a bit cheaper per calorie than McDonald&#8217;s. Healthier, too.</p>
<p>And if I wanted a low-calorie meal at McDonald&#8217;s, I&#8217;d just buy a hamburger (250 calories) and skip the high-calorie, high-markup fried potatoes and fizzy sugar water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
