Entries Tagged as 'Election 08'

When the Boss Comes Calling, Gotta Organize

My lines had been empty all day. Those lines ought to have had tens of thousands of people in them, and they were empty. Field reports ought to have been reassuring, but Central Ohio has an ugly history of voter intimidation. Four years previously, the lines had been hundreds deep and hours long. Four years previously, thousands of (black) voters had been– illegally– turned away. One party stood up and said that voter intimidation wasn’t a big deal. One party, in fact, had said that they were going to solve the opposite problem– paperwork was going to be demanded of everyone before they would be granted the franchise.

That party wasn’t pushing for voter intimidation, not exactly. Just an extra bit of grit in gears of an election. Special grit that only effects people who don’t drive. You know– poor people. It was one more obstacle between citizens and the vote. Just one more thing preying on my mind as I saw empty lines.

The other party– my party– looked at those hours-long lines and shouted out “Never Again!” Well. Alright. Democrats never shout. Shouting is for socialists like Bernie Sanders. But we did sort of hint around the edges that we wouldn’t really like to see that sort of thing ever again. So we had some people sit down and draw up plans. My job was to implement those plans. But my lines were empty.

An hour before the polls closed and my lines were empty. That’s when the van showed up. 30 people in SEIU purple spilled out. Running. “Who’s in charge of this staging location” came the shouted question. I grabbed my crutches and hobbled over. I handed them some walk sheets, watch them work out logistics, grab sandwiches and hustle out to find voters to fill my lines.

There are a lot of lessons from that story. Perhaps most importantly: early voting wins elections. But the great moral lesson is this: whenever poor people need a hand, wherever working people are getting a raw deal, whenever you see someone who would like a job but is being denied, whenever money and power are being used as a tool of oppression, you will see a union fighting against that injustice. Because an injury to one is an injury to all.

Today I stand with the Dropkick Murphys (seriously, take a listen to that song!), Bruce Springsteen (He’s a fair boss), and Martin Luther King Jr. (who was murdered while helping organize an union),and the people of newly-freed Egypt in solidarity with the Workers of Wisconsin.

Without unions, the arc of history is bent less steadily towards justice. That’s everything you need to know.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

I trust Jennifer Brunner

Before I got to Ohio, I knew what everyone else knew: Ohio Democracy is a joke. An awful, sick, joke where racism keeps the Republican Party in power.

I didn’t know until I got there that those problems had been taken care of. Jennifer Brunner had been on the case. Jenifer Brunner fixed the lines, and gave minorities their vote back.

3 Days ago she announced for the Senate.

I hope she wins.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

And close Guantanimo bay!

Just as a reminder: in 2000, the United States elected a president who would go on to torture people, and do so in the name of the American People. In 2008, I worked to elect a man who promises to end that practice, and close down the factory in which we do so.

Barack, you’re on the hook now. You need to begin shutting this place down before 100 days have passed. Do that and I’ll forgive much. Don’t do that and, well… I don’t like your chances for reelection..

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Put your hands up and I’ll copy you…

Matthew Yglesias comes to the utterly unremarkable finding that the House Republican Leadership is deeply polarized. Except that he misinterprets the data. A lot.

DW nominate is a simply score of voting behavior. It’s based on an economic theory called “Spatial voting theory”.* Every time 2 congress members vote together, they move in the same direction. Every time they vote separately, they move apart. It adds a nice visual flavor to dry statistics, and there are a ton of books on the subject. DW nominate can tell you is how often a members of a party act in concert with one another. What it can’t tell you is how “right wing” or “left wing” a person– or party– is.

For example: Assume every Republican votes A) against an individual mandate for healthcare, and B) for Universal Healthcare, and Every Democrat votes A) For the individual mandate, and B) for universal Healthcare. We’d see every member of congress take 1 step away from every member of the opposite party**. This would be an extremely polarized congress, but not one that fits into anyone’s definition of the Right/Left divide.

What we expect to see in caucus leaders is that they tend to vote the same way they’re instructing their caucus to vote. The fact that there are people in the GOP caucus who voted with the caucus more than the leadership is interesting– and may explain why the house GOP had so many troubles over the last two years. But this data does not say that the GOP is moving rightward. We’ll have to look elsewhere for that…

* AKA: POL 100 at UC Davis.
**And incidentally end up with Universal Healthcare with an Individual mandate. Hooray!

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

We’re in trouble now…

I was chatting with Harold Goldstein* a couple days ago. He, like many liberals, is sort of terrified that if Obama is successful at getting a liberal agenda passed, there will be a backlash, causing us to lose power.

This may be true. We liberals got our agenda passed in 1964 and “[lost] the south for a generation”. In 1932, we created a whole “New Deal”, which conservatives have been running against for 70 years.

The thing is, most of the Liberal Agenda is pretty popular. We’re offering people Health Care and an end to the war. If we can get just those 2 things, there can’t be a backlash powerful enough to actually matter. The point of “power” is not some mindless holding of the same, but rather it’s the ability to achieve things. Obama has the ability to achieve things that would really make the world a better place.

We should not fear the backlash. We should fear children dying because the richest country on Earth cannot properly allocate resources. If we save lives and lose elections, it’s a small price to pay…

*around my family, we call him “Uncle Harold”, since my father had the good sense to marry his sister a decade or so ago.

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Because the balance of Power’s maintained that way…

This rather good article in the Politico about Pelosi gives me a good excuse to mention a few thoughts about what the Rahm Emmanuel pick means for the Obama Whitehouse

Until a few months ago, there were basically 2 centers of power within the Democratic Party. Howard Dean’s office and Pelosi’s Office. Reid, near as I can tell, was a non-player. Rahm Emmanuel was Pelosi’s Chief rival. Near as I can tell, he was trying to take credit for the 2006 election since roughly 5 minutes before any results came in.

Now: Obama wins the Whitehouse. Suddenly there are 3 people who can claim to be the power in the Democratic party. This is going to be trouble for everyone. Dean announces that he is going to step down– as he had always intended to do. And Obama takes Pelosi’s biggest rival and makes him Whitehouse Chief of Staff. This removes a sore spot in Pelosi’s leadership team, and puts a major power player on the Obama Staff.

What does this tell us about an Obama administration? He’s a shrewd, shrewd man who will do what it takes to get his agenda passed…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Why I’m supporting Obama. Part Something in an ongoing series.

Under the McCain plan, the rich get richer, and everyone else gets… All their services cut to pay for rich-folk taxcuts. And since the economy depends on everyone not-rich pooling their resrouces to defend themselves against the depredations of the rich, we’re screwed under McCain’s plan.

Unless anyone thinks the traders at Lehman Brothers, brokers at Enron etc couldn’t have spared a few hundred thousand of their millions.

Of course, under Obama’s plan, all but the top .1% of income earners do better than today. For the other 99.9% of us, Well, we get to buy things to fuel the economy. Neat, huh?

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

I invite the media to grow a pair…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

There’s only one problem with this ad…

The name “planned parenthood” will turn off a lot of people…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare

Behind McCain’s Green screen…

Bookmark/FavoritesDeliciousDiggEvernoteFacebookGoogle BookmarksGoogle ReaderInstapaperRedditSlashdotStumbleUponStumpediaTwitterTypePad PostWordPressShare